Hollahoop vs UserVoice
A UserVoice alternative for product teams that want the loop without enterprise overhead.
UserVoice is built for large support teams with a sales-led motion. Hollahoop is the lighter, developer-friendly version — same public board, voting, and roadmap, priced for product teams and free to start.
Where UserVoice shines
- Deep integrations with help-desk products like Zendesk
- Reporting suited to large support orgs
- Established enterprise procurement track
Where Hollahoop is different
- Self-serve setup — no sales call to get going
- Public API for everything, no "contact us for an integration"
- Native MCP server for Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT and Codex
Side by side
We compare on shape and architecture, not just feature counts. Anything you can't see here, ask us at [email protected].
| Feature | Hollahoop | UserVoice |
|---|---|---|
| Public roadmap & changelog | Included | Included |
| Voting on feature requests | Included | Varies by plan |
| Native MCP server for AI agents | Built-in | Not available |
| Public API for every feature | Full surface | Subset of features |
| One tool for feedback + roadmap + changelog + docs | Yes | Subset |
| Per-user pricing | Never | Common |
| Custom domain | Included on paid | Higher tier |
| Free plan | No time limit, no card | Limited or trial |
Move your feedback loop in an afternoon
Free tier, no credit card. Bring your existing posts and votes through the public API or MCP server.